Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20001213195731.025c3550@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender: usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:00:39 -0500
To: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject: Re: Locking fcntl changes #2
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <200012130834.JAA15590@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20001212202947 DOT 025a4c70 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 09:34 AM 12/13/00 +0100, Martin Stromberg wrote:
<Snipped>
 >>  >Why are you using lseek() here and not llseek?
 >>
 >> Because this is the 31-bit section, not the FAT32 section.  I use
 >> llseek in the FAT32 section.
 >
 >But llseek will do the job as well and better.

Understood.  With Eli's comments after my investigation of filelength 
also in mind, I agree that it should be llseek consistently.

Although I might also just modify filelength itself to use llseek, I 
will still change all of fcntl's lseek's to llseek's.

---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)