Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:24:14 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: dj AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <7458-Sun10Dec2000202414+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200012101644.LAA18214@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie
	on Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:44:11 -0500)
Subject: Re: CVS port
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001210094241 DOT 700L-100000 AT is> <200012101644 DOT LAA18214 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:44:11 -0500
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> > ?? Are you saying that GPL frowns on releases based on development 
> > snapshots?
> 
> No, the GPL frowns on shipping binaries without sources.

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood.  I understand now that your exemption is
that binaries are permitted even if the CVS snapshot used to build
them is not included.

I think Tim wanted to include those sources, so I think this special
provision is not needed in this case.