Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20001207204302.00a4dec0@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender: usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 20:48:05 -0500
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject: Re: Bug in tests/makefile.inc
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3A2FDC6D.86AF8881@softhome.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 07:52 PM 12/7/00 +0100, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
 >There is a line saying
 >
 >LINK = ld $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@ ${LIB}/libgcc.a -T
 >${TOP}/../../lib/djgpp.djl
 >
 >However, current GCC libgcc.a lives in 
lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/X.YZ/libgcc.a.
 >
 >What's the point of specifying explicit link command? Maybe it can be 

 >removed?

Already fixed as part of the locking fcntl updates I am still finishing 
up.  See my message with subject "Locking fcntl() and flock() patches" 
on Nov. 27.  Hopefully I will be submitting a more finished version 
Real Soon Now, but the makefile.inc changes are stable.

HTH

---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)