Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:22:30 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Message-Id: <7263-Thu07Dec2000232229+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A2FD9C3.BB64BCDB@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Thu, 07 Dec 2000 19:41:07 +0100)
Subject: Re: DJGPP linker script update
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001207170610 DOT 28444D-100000 AT is> <3A2FD9C3 DOT BB64BCDB AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 19:41:07 +0100
> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> 
> Is it possible to turn bfdsymify into a library which takes executable file
> name, list of addresses in trace, returns symified info, and submit for
> binutils that?

Yes, it's possible.  But will they accept this?  It will be
essentially an improved addr2line implemented as a library.  Without
applications willing to use that library, what incentive do Binutils
maintainers have to add that?