Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 18:46:58 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <4331-Fri01Dec2000184658+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200012011435.PAA09759@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:35:13 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: Locking fcntl() and flock() patches
References:  <200012011435 DOT PAA09759 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:35:13 +0100 (MET)
> 
>      F_GETLK64      Equivalent to F_GETLK,  but  takes  a  struct
>                     flock64  argument  rather than a struct flock
>                     argument.

Thanks, Martin!

Peter, I think this explains everything.  If you don't mind writing
yet another bunch of "case F_..." clauses and adding the necessary
code to support FAT32, it would be mighty nice ;-).