Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:06:34 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Locking fcntl() and flock() patches
In-Reply-To: <3A2611B2.30170.382C7@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001130160535.25556I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mark E. wrote:

> > Btw, Windows 9X will disallow some of the file accesses (when the file
> > is open) if another program has it already open.  Perhaps that's what
> > Mark meant with ``read locks on per file basis''?
> 
> Actually, I was thinking about the SH_DENY* flags.

Yes, that's what I had in mind also.

So you wanted to implement shared locks by using SH_DENY* flags instead 
of Int 21h/AH=5Ch, yes?