Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:27:59 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djasm documentation patches
In-Reply-To: <20001127162240.E19525@kendall.sfbr.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001128092739.27656G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, JT Williams wrote:

> -: To make this all easier, I suggest either to put djasm.txi into 
> -: src/utils, and add an @include to utils.txi.  This should cause djasm's 
> -: docs to be part of utils.info.
> 
> I've always felt that djasm was (or could be) more than just a `Utility',
> which is why I had planned to put it in the `From djdevNNN.zip' section
> of the top-level `dir' file (see demo formats below).

I have no problems with that, but something needs to be added to the
makefile's to actually make that happen.  My suggestion was meant to
make this easier.

> But if djasm.txi *is* moved to src/utils/, then I would argue that djasm.y
> should be moved as well, and djasm should be given its own home like for
> djtar.

You could leave djasm.txi where djasm.y lives, and include it from
utils.tex like this:

  @include ../stub/djasm.txi

> >From djdevNNN.zip
> 
> * Knowledge Base: (kb).
>         The DJGPP Knowledge Base
> 
> * djasm: (djasm).
>         The DJGPP 16-bit Assembler (limited functionality)


If djasm's docs is part of utils.tex, the only thing you need to
change here is this:

 * djasm: (utils)djasm.
         The DJGPP 16-bit Assembler (limited functionality)