From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200011272238.XAA13549@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: djasm documentation patches
In-Reply-To: <20001127162240.E19525@kendall.sfbr.org> from JT Williams at "Nov 27, 2000 04:22:40 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 23:38:00 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to JT Williams:
> -: This still leaves the problem of getting djasm.txi converted to an Info 
> -: file and being installed into the info/ directory by the build process.
> 
> Yes, and this could get complicated.
> 
> -: To make this all easier, I suggest either to put djasm.txi into 
> -: src/utils, and add an @include to utils.txi.  This should cause djasm's 
> -: docs to be part of utils.info.
> 
> I've always felt that djasm was (or could be) more than just a `Utility',
> which is why I had planned to put it in the `From djdevNNN.zip' section
> of the top-level `dir' file (see demo formats below).
> 
> But if djasm.txi *is* moved to src/utils/, then I would argue that djasm.y
> should be moved as well, and djasm should be given its own home like for
> djtar.  But, this breaks the make of djasm.exe in `src/stub/makefile'.
> 
> Advice most welcome.

Perhaps djasm is worthy of its own directory below src/?


Right,

						MartinS