Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 01:11:04 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pjfarley AT banet DOT net
Message-Id: <5137-Sun26Nov2000011103+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <5.0.1.4.0.20001125113859.00a4a0a0@pop5.banet.net>
	(pjfarley AT banet DOT net)
Subject: Re: How are include/*.h headers maintained?
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 4 DOT 0 DOT 20001125025008 DOT 00a4bc20 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
 <5 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 4 DOT 0 DOT 20001125013858 DOT 00a5dcc0 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
 <5 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 4 DOT 0 DOT 20001125013858 DOT 00a5dcc0 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
 <5 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 4 DOT 0 DOT 20001125025008 DOT 00a4bc20 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net> <5 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 4 DOT 0 DOT 20001125113859 DOT 00a4a0a0 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:51:10 -0500
> From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
> 
> In that case, I would like to change the mapping of DOS error 24h (33) 
> to EACCES from EPERM, since that is what fcntl is supposed to return in 
> those cases where a lock cannot be obtained.  Is it all right for me to 
> change the __doserr_to_errno mapping for this?

Yes, I think so.

> Are the texinfo conventions and style used in these doc files 
> documented anywhere in a concise manner?

Not really; but see src/mkdoc/sample.txh.  The rest is in the Texinfo
manual, which I strongly recommend to consult.

>  >It would be nice to have kind of literal programming in place for
>  >DJGPP, but no one has yet volunteered to make it happen.
> 
> I know you meant to say "literate" there

Yes ;-)