Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 18:30:07 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De
Message-Id: <3791-Fri24Nov2000183005+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <78A53643B9@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
	(ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De)
Subject: Re: Patch #2 for dtou.c
References: <71D4EB076F AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de>	(ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De) <78A53643B9 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:47:42 +0200
>
> I hope I have fixed it. Please inspect the sources.
> Now, if the file is unchanged the timestamp will always be preserved
> no mather if the `-t' option has been given or not.

Looks okay now, thanks.

Btw, did you test the case where CR is the last character in the file,
with or without a Ctrl-Z after it?  I don't see anything immediately
wrong, but the logic is complicated, so I think it's worth testing.