Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20001117164308.0256b420@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender: usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:46:28 -0500
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject: Re: fcntl regression test source?
Cc: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3A154769.7208.859271@localhost>
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 4 DOT 0 DOT 20001117134830 DOT 00a58be0 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 02:57 PM 11/17/00 -0500, Mark E. wrote:
 >> myself?  Mark E., what did you use to decide that the enhanced
 >>version you posted to the list had errors?
 >
 >Well, I've only done limited testing on the enhanced fcntl and that
 >testing was some time ago. I used a program to list what handles it
 >inherited so I could tell if the inheritance part worked. The locking 

 >code I just traced with RHIDE.

Could you send or post the source to that program?  At least it would 
give me a start on a new test program.

Thanks again.

---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)