Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:42:42 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com
Message-Id: <8011-Thu09Nov2000004241+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A09A146.388BF250@bigfoot.com> (message from Richard Dawe on
	Wed, 08 Nov 2000 18:53:58 +0000)
Subject: Re: Lots of bogus bugs
References:  <3A09A146 DOT 388BF250 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 18:53:58 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
> 
> We seem to be getting a lot of bogus bugs reported, e.g. bugs not in DJGPP
> itself. Maybe some text should be added to:
> 
>     http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/bugs/
> 
> suggesting that a question is posted/mailed to the DJGPP
> newsgroup/mail2news gateway, before a bug report is filed.

It looks like people don't read the instructions on that page at all,
because the bug-tracker explicitly says to submit reports only for
v2/dj*.zip packages, and we still get reports about RHIDE, GRX, G++,
and whatsnot...