Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20001025195718.00b053b0@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender: usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:58:50 -0400
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject: Re: New versions of perl require "flock" or working "fcntl(fh,
  F_SETLK/W,...)"
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001025094147.7418D-100000@is>
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20001024220333 DOT 00b166d0 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 09:42 AM 10/25/00 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
 >On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Peter J. Farley III wrote:
 >> OK, then we stick with flock, right?
 >It doesn't really matter: once one is written, it's a trivial job to
 >write the other (since on platforms supported by DJGPP the 
difference >between their functionality is a moot point).

Agreed.  Flock is what I'll concentrate on (along with fcntl, of 
course).

Peter
---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)