Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:42:19 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: New versions of perl require "flock" or working "fcntl(fh, F_SETLK/W,...)"
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.0.20001024220333.00b166d0@pop5.banet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001025094147.7418D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Peter J. Farley III wrote:

> OK, then we stick with flock, right?

It doesn't really matter: once one is written, it's a trivial job to
write the other (since on platforms supported by DJGPP the difference
between their functionality is a moot point).