Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20001024220333.00b166d0@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender: usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:06:06 -0400
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject: Re: New versions of perl require "flock" or working "fcntl(fh,
  F_SETLK/W,...)"
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024110138.24828P-100000@is>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001024092921 DOT 24828F-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 11:02 AM 10/24/00 +0200, you wrote:
<Snipped>
 >On closer look, lockf is not a Posix function.

OK, then we stick with flock, right?
---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)