Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:04:23 -0400
Message-Id: <200009292304.TAA17038@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200009291728.TAA24015@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:28:06 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: djasm and Y2K...
References:  <200009291728 DOT TAA24015 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Shall we go to four digits or subract 100?
> 
> While we are talking about this piece: could we change the MM/DD/YY
> format to YY/MM/DD or YY-MM-DD which every sane person should use
> (hello Americans...)?

If we're changing it anyway, I'd prefer changing to YYYY-MM-DD.  Any
other format is potentially confusing, but having the year first
implies sort-order, meaning month would logically be next.