Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:30:49 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <8582-Sat30Sep2000003049+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200009291650.SAA23887@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:50:36 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: stub text shift
References:  <200009291650 DOT SAA23887 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:50:36 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> Would running "gdb program_with_new_stub" and trying to set a
> breakpoint and nexting and stepping a little be considered as working
> with GDB?

That's the minimum, but feel free to test more ;-)

For example, I'd suggest to look at the code of `v2loadimage' (that's
where the debuggee's stub info and the sections info is read), and
make sure that all the values computed there are identical whether the
debugge has the old or the new stub.

Oh, and please make sure you say "gdb foo.exe", not "gdb foo".  (Sorry
for asking the obvious...)