Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:23:04 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <3995-Sat30Sep2000002304+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200009291646.SAA23871@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:46:23 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: stub text shift
References:  <200009291646 DOT SAA23871 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:46:23 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> What should I test with go32-v2? "go32-v2 <program_with_new_stub>"?

Yes.  But there's much more to this; see the commentary near the
beginning of go32-v2.c, which describes all the possible ways go32-v2
can be invoked.  Only some of them are relevant to stubbed
executables, though.

This should be tested both with stock go32-v2 from djdev203, and with
a version that has the new stub.