From: Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14804.54515.70345.692428@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:44:19 -0700
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djasm and Y2K...
In-Reply-To: <200009291728.TAA24015@father.ludd.luth.se>
References: <200009291728 DOT TAA24015 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.5.1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Martin Str|mberg writes:
 > I'm seeing this in the stub:
 > $Id: stub.asm built 09/26/100 18:44:19 by djasm $
 > ^M
 > @(#) stub.asm built 09/26/100 18:44:19 by djasm
 > ^M
 > 
 > Ooops!
 > 
 > This is the guilty code in djasm.y:
 >
 > Shall we go to four digits or subract 100?
 > 
 > While we are talking about this piece: could we change the MM/DD/YY
 > format to YY/MM/DD or YY-MM-DD which every sane person should use
 > (hello Americans...)?

How about something of the form 08 Sep 2000 which is unambiguous?

Or else ISO format: 20000908

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu