From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200009291643.SAA23857@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: (fwd) startup-code
In-Reply-To: <9003-Fri29Sep2000102429+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Sep 29, 2000 10:24:29 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:43:58 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> Martin, I think you can commit this, and then we'll let time tell if
> it's okay ;-)

Ok. Is this ok as wc204.txi entry:
"@cindex lib/djgpp DOT djl AT r{, polluting the namespace unnecessarily}
The linker script @code{lib/djgpp.djl} corrected to not unnecessarily
pollute the name space with the symbols @code{etext}, @code{edata} and
@code{end}."


Right,

						MartinS