From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200009221319.PAA03252@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:19:25 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: stub text shift
References:  <200009221319 DOT PAA03252 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <20000923235656.724AD2313C@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:56:56 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:19:25 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> So am I right when I assume silence means agreement? (I'm going to
> apply the patch, unless somebody screams.)

Every patch can be backed out by someone with a write access to CVS ;-)

Anyway, please do make sure the programs with the new stub work
correctly when run from other DJGPP programs, including with long
command lines.  Also, test with go32-v2 and under GDB.

FWIW, I don't have any strong feelings about this change.  If DJ
objects, I don't think we should do it.