Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 16:16:16 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: EXE header in DJGPP programs
In-Reply-To: <200009041026.MAA03469@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000904161453.6738D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> If that is the case, it's amazing that we aren't violating contents of
> other fields in the header.

All the other fields are before the stub blurb.