Message-ID: <39B2076B.DECEB5E2@softhome.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 10:10:19 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: mail AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Symify fixes
References: <3b5rqskv9adg5lcc3p4nhg2doib859r3n8 AT 4ax DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000831074644 DOT 20860E-100000 AT is> <4j7tqskrvkecn18jfdi9vtpbo5skmm82ke AT 4ax DOT com> <2561-Fri01Sep2000092048+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <jea2rsk8mdep7qs6d9n6po6d0bgntg1m7o AT 4ax DOT com> <4839-Sat02Sep2000211131+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > The real point is whether to commit all or some of the patches to
> > symify.  IMHO, modified bail() should be commited.
> 
> FWIW, I agree.

Me too. It's in.

Laurynas