Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 07:46:38 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, mail AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk
Subject: Re: Symify fixes
In-Reply-To: <39AD6455.DC1FCF30@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000831074607.20860D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> static void bail(const char *msg) __attribute__ ((noreturn));
> 
> And here is the function:
> 
> static void bail(const char *msg)
> {
>   assert(msg);
> 
>   if (errno)
>      fprintf(stderr, "Symify error: %s: %s\n", msg, strerror(errno));
>   else
>      fprintf(stderr, "Symify error: %s\n", msg);
>   exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }

This looks okay to me, but for future picky compilers, please make the
prototype and the definition consistent:

static void __attribute__((noreturn)) bail(const char *msg)
{
  assert(msg);
  ...