Message-ID: <399A922F.2458DE9B@softhome.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:07:59 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: open() adjustment for symlinks
References: <200008161238 DOT OAA09506 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> As a matter of fact I _can_ envision a possible use for a symlink
> FSEXT hook: suppose someone want to be able to handle umsdos
> extensions on FAT?

I think that hook for readlink() is reasonable in this case (__solve_symlinks()
uses just readlink() anyway.). Maybe hook for symlink() is required here
too? If nobody objects, I implement them.

Laurynas