From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200008150916.LAA08870@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: <limits.h> change for symlinks
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:16:29 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <2593-Tue15Aug2000084342+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Aug 15, 2000 08:43:42 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Are you sure this is for symlinks?  The fragment doesn't tell anything
> that would give a clue.

Yes, it was in a function called follow_link() or resolve_link() or
something like that. Besides in which other case would ELOOP be
generated?


Right,

						MartinS