Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:59:50 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: lauras AT softhome DOT net Message-Id: <9743-Tue15Aug2000085950+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <399844B1.9A99D08F@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis on Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:12:49 +0200) Subject: Re: Patch: lstat() adjustments for symlinks References: <399844B1 DOT 9A99D08F AT softhome DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:12:49 +0200 > From: Laurynas Biveinis > > It adds new macros S_ISLNK and S_IFLNK, as well as code to set them > in lstat() and testsuite. Thanks! > Any comments? One minor one, about the doco: > +@findex S_IFLNK AT r{, and symlink support} > +@findex S_IFLNK AT r{, added to the library} There's something I learned a long time ago from Richard Stallman: It is not very useful to have more than a single index entry which all begin with the same substring and all point to the same place (or to very close places). They are redundant: a person who uses the index lookup commands will find the place if only one of these index entries is left. One more nit: > Index: djgpp/tests/libc/posix/sys/stat/lstat.c [snip] > + printf("Test 2 passed\n"); > + remove(tmp_file); > + return 0; > +} > \ No newline at end of file Unless you have a good reason for this lack of a newline, please add one. I'm afraid some brain-dead editors will barf on such files, or did some weird things with the last line.