Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:04:05 -0400
Message-Id: <200008041704.NAA31305@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <398AF6AD.71958EE2@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Fri, 04 Aug 2000 19:00:29 +0200)
Subject: Re: Better GCC news
References: <397CA24B DOT 7788CBB0 AT softhome DOT net> <398AF6AD DOT 71958EE2 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> So nobody wants to become DJGPP port maintainer? It would, uhm, a
> bit strange - we kept complaining loudly about unreviewed patches
> and reject opportunity to speed things up.
> 
> In particular, I'm interested in Mark's opinion, because he IMHO is
> best suited person for this.

FYI I've become a maintainer for the cygwin parts of gcc, and I
mentioned to Gerald that I might as well be a DJGPP maintainer as
well, although I'd prefer that the people who actually port GCC to
DJGPP get involved (as I'm usually pretty busy).