Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:53:43 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Another step to symlinks
In-Reply-To: <39847B14.9330C86A@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000731085324.2256C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> IIRC, Eli has said that DJGPP didn't use !proxy only because
> there might be some subtle bug lurking somewhere. If there is
> any, let's face it.

If there are any problems, you won't see them unless you rebuild Make,
GCC, and Bash with the modified library, and use them for a while.