Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:13:20 -0400
Message-Id: <200007242113.RAA20724@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200007242110.XAA06567@mailgw3.netvision.net.il>
	(eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il)
Subject: Re: Better GCC news
References: <397CA24B DOT 7788CBB0 AT softhome DOT net> <200007242110 DOT XAA06567 AT mailgw3 DOT netvision DOT net DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> And what exactly do we gain from this procedure, assuming The Powers
> That Be approve the nominee?

A DJGPP GCC maintainer would be able to check changes to
djgpp-specific files into the gcc CVS repository without needing to
get authorization from anyone else.