Message-Id: <200007210902.MAA22546@mailgw1.netvision.net.il>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:02:39 +0200
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3977FBFD.EF6DA2D7@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:30:05 +0200)
Subject: Re: <stdarg.h> matters
References: <39774EA5 DOT 7AA0AE0F AT softhome DOT net> <200007201919 DOT PAA31783 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <39775851 DOT A2449BF8 AT softhome DOT net> <200007201950 DOT PAA32032 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3977FBFD DOT EF6DA2D7 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:30:05 +0200
> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> 
> On the second note, if we will use GCC's stdarg.h, IMHO there is no
> point mirroring all its definitions anyway.

I don't understand: why would we need to mirror its definitions?