Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 03:50:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200007210750.DAA10677@indy.delorie.com>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To: mrs AT windriver DOT com
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org,
        martin AT loewis DOT home DOT cs DOT tu-berlin DOT de
In-reply-to: <200007202025.NAA01726@kankakee.wrs.com> (message from Mike Stump
	on Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:25:40 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port
References:  <200007202025 DOT NAA01726 AT kankakee DOT wrs DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Mike Stump <mrs AT windriver DOT com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> You have three options, either submit the work to make them more
> independent, submit the work to make gcc agree, or don't make them
> work together (no work).  Let me know which option you want to pursue
> and I can help you.

The first option, of course.  I apologize if I managed to confuse
things so that it wasn't clear.

Could we please go back to discussing the headers that GCC currently
wants to install, one by one, and see what needs to be done to get to
a more independent setup?