From: Mike Stump <mrs AT windriver DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200007202308.QAA06365@kankakee.wrs.com>
To: dj AT delorie DOT com, martin AT loewis DOT home DOT cs DOT tu-berlin DOT de
Subject: Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:30:42 -0400
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> To: martin AT loewis DOT home DOT cs DOT tu-berlin DOT de

> > Please tell me how you implement the above requirement without testing
> > whether NULL has been defined?

> They all define it to exactly the same thing: 0

While you may like that definition, we feel that is the wrong
definition.  You can either, change it to be what we feel is right, or
ignore us.  Your choice.  If you choose to ignore us, you can submit
changes to gcc to try and work around any problems you have, but, in
the end, we may merely reject those patches as the wrong solution.

Good luck.