Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:50:30 -0400 Message-Id: <200007201950.PAA32032@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <39775851.A2449BF8@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis on Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:51:45 +0200) Subject: Re: matters References: <39774EA5 DOT 7AA0AE0F AT softhome DOT net> <200007201919 DOT PAA31783 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <39775851 DOT A2449BF8 AT softhome DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk You were going to put a test in that would force a compile to fail merely because of the version of gcc. If the compile would have worked anyway, then we shouldn't cause gratuitous errors. I.e. don't #error just because we *should* have gcc's headers. Only #error if we *must* have gcc's headers.