Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:38:04 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port
In-Reply-To: <3976C5F3.203.1592BB@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000720173355.27636A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Mark E. wrote:

> > Instead, cc1plus will emit 'zero' immediate values in assembler,
> > depending on the assembler language (e.g. clearing eax).
> > 
> 
> Eli, this appears to be correct:

Thanks for verifying.

At least we gained something constructive from this exchange: we now 
know that 0 and __null are interchangeable as far as libc is concerned.
So we can now DTRT in our headers without fear.

I still didn't give up hope to limit the headers taken from GCC to
varargs.h and stdarg.h.  Let's see how much more offense I'd need to
sustain to get there ;-)