Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:23:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200007201523.LAA09833@indy.delorie.com> From: Eli Zaretskii To: snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org In-reply-to: <3976C53B.9738.12C0B3@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com) Subject: Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Mark E." > Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:24:11 -0400 > > > > In any case, the following headers out of the above list seem > > > especially dangerous: > > > > > > - errno.h > > > - limits.h > > > - assert.h > > > - math.h > > These are fixincluded headers. Or at least they aren't in the replacement > header directory. Don't worry about these. Perhaps I misunderstood: someone (either Mike or Martin) said that stddef.h and assert.h, at least, are installed by the compiler. If that is not true, this is a non-issue. I apologize for any confusion I might have caused. > > > - stddef.h > > > > This one is along with: > iso646.h > stdarg.h > stdbool.h > varargs.h I think varargs.h and stdarg.h will have to be taken from GCC. I think Mike said that stddef.h can be left out (on platforms which already have it). This leaves us with iso646.h and stdbool.h. Ideally, I'd like these not to be installed by GCC, either, to avoid interdependencies between the GCC and DJGPP library distributions, even though these two headers are relatively harmless.