Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:03:40 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port
In-Reply-To: <3974477C.5D165057@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000718150102.2467H-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> But what if some GCC features will stop working if they expect
> particular builtins in headers?

We will have to make sure we have those builtins in our headers.

Note that I didn't say we should toss the idea of using GCC's headers.  
At least as far as I'm concerned, I didn't yet arrive to that 
conclusion.  I still hope we might find some reasonable compromise.

I also think others should comment on this as well.