Message-ID: <39741C04.A67F5876@softhome.net> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:57:40 +0200 From: Laurynas Biveinis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: lt,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Bruce Korb , mrs AT windriver DOT com, gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port References: <200007171736 DOT KAA29313 AT kankakee DOT wrs DOT com> <39734D95 DOT 6D145F00 AT softhome DOT net> <39735540 DOT C8BD0707 AT sco DOT com> <200007180808 DOT EAA06910 AT indy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The problem is that we (the DJGPP maintainers) don't understand why > should the headers need to be ``fixed''. As far as we know, they are > just fine. This raises one more sensitive issue - remember 'minimizing the FAQs'? Our uses va_list, at least this will be changed by fixincludes. Laurynas