From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200007161350.PAA15898@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: @r{, @code{blabla}}
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:50:57 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Is it ok to use @code{} in @r{}? I ask because of this:
Index: src/docs/kb/wc204.txi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 wc204.txi
--- wc204.txi   2000/07/09 05:27:38     1.8
+++ wc204.txi   2000/07/16 13:44:23
@@ -66,3 +66,7 @@

 @findex rand AT r{, increased period}
 The series produced by @code{rand} have a longer period.
+
+@findex rand48 AT r{, increased speed of @code{drand48} and @code{erand48}}
+The execution speed of @code{drand48} and @code{erand48} has been improved.
+

makeinfo gladly accepts it and it looks ok in info, but as Eli usually
have knowledge what will happen in printed docs, I though I should
ask.


Right,

							MartinS