Message-ID: <39719647.855817A8@softhome.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:02:31 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: Bash 2.04 beta 5 released
References: <39709DBE DOT 12028 DOT 139A6A AT localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I've found the responsible change between betas:

diff -u -r -N bash-2.04.old/lib/dos/dosutil.c bash-2.04.new/lib/dos/dosutil.c
--- bash-2.04.old/lib/dos/dosutil.c	Tue May 30 23:58:50 2000
+++ bash-2.04.new/lib/dos/dosutil.c	Fri Jun  2 00:36:06 2000
@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@
   NULL,
 };
 
+static void dummy(void)
+{
+  __dosexec_find_on_path (0,0,0);
+  __libc_termios_init();
+}
+
 char *
 dosutil_maybe_encode_drivename (char *path)
 {

Just apply this patch to old beta and the problem vanishes. But it
still leaves a lot of room for thinking, why?

Laurynas