Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:00:51 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP problem executing a script
In-Reply-To: <397081F5.45AF1620@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000716110005.21329A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> > The practice until now was that if, after a few days' wait, nobody
> > posts any comments that require some rework, anyone with write access
> > can commit the changes.  
> 
> Uhm, 'anyone' means 'noone' too often.

Patches that were too radical to be included in v2.03 were postponed,
but that's about all.  "No one too often" seems like an unfair
description of this.

> There already have been few lost patches (say, my fchown().

I have most of the patches safely stashed away, and in addition,
everything posted here is archived on DJ's server.  So nothing's
ever ``lost''.

However, as usual, the best way of having something done is to sit
down and do that...