Message-Id: <200007151331.PAA10807@mailgw3.netvision.net.il>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 16:31:54 +0200
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <39703247.B33FE01D@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:43:35 +0200)
Subject: Re: DJGPP problem executing a script
References: <3961CDF5 DOT 18859 DOT 1F145B AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com) <396276AF DOT 14877 DOT 82B7E AT localhost> <39703247 DOT B33FE01D AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:43:35 +0200
> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> 
> Perhaps we could agree who should install patches from folks who
> can't do that themselves? IMHO having a person (e.g. me) who could
> be constantly pestered about "This patch was submitted and approved
> few weeks ago, but not installed, why?"  would speed up things. I
> could be that person.

Thanks for volunteering.

The practice until now was that if, after a few days' wait, nobody
posts any comments that require some rework, anyone with write access
can commit the changes.  Given that you have enough time to always do
that, there's no need to change this agreement, I think.  Just be sure
to say that you committed them, so others will know, even if they
don't get the automatic email notification.