From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200007131716.TAA29835@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Making entries in the function index of libc.tex
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000713092415.12595C-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jul 13, 2000 09:25:39 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:16:41 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> Then how about changing the name of the node to something like this:
> 
>   @node rand48 family, random number
> 
> I'm assuming that people are likely to look for "rand48" most of the 
> time.

That is exactly the problem, non-UNIX people probably don't know to
look at rand48!


> (This thread confirms, once again, my firm belief that we should add
> an index to libc.info.  Any takers?)

It would be great, yes! But time, time, time...


Right,

							MartinS