Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:32:07 -0400
Message-Id: <200007121732.NAA21426@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200007121648.SAA23945@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:48:29 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: Making entries in the function index of libc.tex
References:  <200007121648 DOT SAA23945 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> My *rand48 functions are documented in a single .txh page, which
> results in one entry in the alphabetical listing. I'd like to have
> each one of the functions appear in the index (which then points to
> the same, one and only page). Is this easily attainable?

What I've done before is to do a tiny page for the variants that just
xref's the master page.  You can put multiple sections in a .txh (just
put another @node and mkdoc splits it up).  Or, you could implement
some new @-function that only mkdoc knows about.