Message-Id: <200007070843.LAA07534@alpha.netvision.net.il>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 11:45:16 +0200
To: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200007070736.JAA12848@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:36:02 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: mkdoc patch
References:  <200007070736 DOT JAA12848 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:36:02 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> If we are in the adding mode, why not add C89 and C99 too?

I agree that it's a good idea.  However, one of these two should be
called ANSI.  Or maybe even ANSI(C89) and ANSI(C99).  Otherwise we
will have redundant categories on the one hand, and an ANSI category
which is not clearly defined.