Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:00:58 -0400
Message-Id: <200006261500.LAA11781@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <39570457.244EB194@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:20:55 +0200)
Subject: Re: Patch: chown() preparation for symlinks
References: <395643BB DOT 7109B0DA AT softhome DOT net> <200006252041 DOT XAA24142 AT alpha DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <39570457 DOT 244EB194 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Or maybe it is better to optimize access() for F_OK case?

We can't optimize the link based on a runtime option.  Unless we can
figure out a way to do time travel in software :-)