Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:26:42 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: chown() preparation for symlinks
In-Reply-To: <39570457.244EB194@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000626112524.6395D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Or maybe it is better to optimize access() for F_OK case?

We can't, unless I'm missing something.  AFAIK, all the added complexity 
*is* for the F_OK case.