Message-ID: <39566596.3002C6A7@softhome.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:03:34 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Bash 2.04 beta 5 released
References: <3954E8D3 DOT 16959 DOT 132E0E1 AT localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

"Mark E." wrote:
> You imply that you rebult Bash 2.04 with your symlink-patches, I suggest
> doing the same with the Bash 2.03 and see if the problem persists. If not, it
> suggests an incompatibility between Bash 2.04's way of handling temporary
> files and the symlink patches.

I've investigated the problem futher:
bash 2.04 binaries from your site work OK;
bash 2.04 recompiled here w/o symlink with latest DJGPP CVS has the problem.

So I suspect the problem is with DJGPP. Did you try to build bash 
with latest djdev from CVS?

Laurynas