From: "Martin Str\\"omberg" <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>"@ludd.luth.se
Message-Id: <200006221906.VAA29745@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Patch: new GCC builtins for stdarg.h/varargs.h
In-Reply-To: <39525DBB.905C4611@softhome.net> from Laurynas Biveinis at "Jun 22, 2000 08:40:59 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 21:06:06 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Laurynas Biveinis:
> Can anyone explicitly approve that patch, or is it OK because
> it was here for some time and nobody has spoken up?

Well, personally I think two days is a little short. If nobody has
objected within a week, I'd say go ahead.


Right,

							MartinS