Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:28:34 -0400
Message-Id: <200006201828.OAA24533@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200006201814.VAA17264@alpha.netvision.net.il>
	(eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il)
Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/include/dos.h
References: <200006191758 DOT NAA02002 AT delorie DOT com> <200006201814 DOT VAA17264 AT alpha DOT netvision DOT net DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Isn't it better to omit parameter names from the prototypes, or at
> least give them names that begin with underscores?

The convention is to always include the parameter names, and prepend
underscores.  Last time this came up we agreed that the
"documentation" value of the parameter names warranted this little
extra work to keep the headers namespace-clean.